|
|
Post by Past-Watch on Mar 12, 2005 11:14:35 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by rupert on Mar 14, 2005 9:44:04 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]you know, that last spidey from marvel legends 10 looks a lot like mark bagley's spiderman. [/glow]  |
|
|
|
Post by Kapusta on Mar 14, 2005 15:42:05 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]you know, that last spidey from marvel legends 10 looks a lot like mark bagley's spiderman. [/glow]  I think that's the idea, I read it on some site. |
|
|
|
Post by rupert on Mar 15, 2005 12:05:21 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]can you post that link, please. i would like to read it. it probably has more info as well. thanks.[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by Batman on Mar 24, 2005 20:27:07 GMT -5
I saw the link of the Snap Shot spider-man. I got him. He is dissappointing. He has a lot of articulation, but his joints are very tight and i fear breaking him to loosen them up.
|
|
|
|
Post by rupert on Mar 25, 2005 10:02:18 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]i saw this figure at walmart wednesday. it is crappy looking. down from the color to the sculpt. it looks weird. i examined it and concluded it was not worth it at all. thanks for the info, bats. got any pictures?[/glow]
|
|
|
|
Post by Randy13 on Mar 25, 2005 11:24:13 GMT -5
The snap shot spidey looks crappy, or the ML 10 spidey?
|
|
|
|
Post by Batman on Mar 26, 2005 23:36:16 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]i saw this figure at walmart wednesday. it is crappy looking. down from the color to the sculpt. it looks weird. i examined it and concluded it was not worth it at all. thanks for the info, bats. got any pictures?[/glow] Honestly, you don't want pictures. The whole figure sucks. it's a terrible representation. The only good thing for it is customizing it into a more muscular character. |
|
|
|
Post by Randy13 on Mar 28, 2005 15:03:28 GMT -5
I just saw the snap-shot spidey. Whata crappy shade of blue--SMURF blue. And he is rather large and bulky.
Just to clarify about the McFarlane spidey--how is his head movement limited? Up and down? Side to side?
|
|
|
|
Post by rupert on Mar 28, 2005 16:18:29 GMT -5
I just saw the snap-shot spidey. Whata crappy shade of blue--SMURF blue. And he is rather large and bulky. Just to clarify about the McFarlane spidey--how is his head movement limited? Up and down? Side to side? [glow=red,2,300]it's a great figure. i recommend buying. the neck movement is perfect. i'll tell you this; this weekend i re-bought the spiderman 2 movie version- the one with too many articualtion points, the mcfarlane spidey not only looks better, but moves better because the preportions are more in tune to the comic than to a real human preportion. get many! i don't recommend many figures, but this is a must, randy13![/glow] |
|
|
|
Post by Randy13 on Mar 28, 2005 16:36:29 GMT -5
Great--now I'll have to go back to San Antonio to get one  Does anyone know if the upcoming ML '1st appearance' spidey uses the same body as the McFarlane Spidey? |
|
|
|
Post by rupert on Mar 28, 2005 16:38:30 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]the body looks a lot like the mcfarlane spidey, but i have been wrong. check out theis other review of the mcfarlane spidey, randy13! www.mwctoys.com/REVIEW_032505b.htmif its too far for you, let me know. i can ship it at cost.[/glow] |
|
|
|
Post by Randy13 on Mar 28, 2005 19:13:24 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]the body looks a lot like the mcfarlane spidey, but i have been wrong. check out theis other review of the mcfarlane spidey, randy13! www.mwctoys.com/REVIEW_032505b.htmif its too far for you, let me know. i can ship it at cost.[/glow] That's okay--I actually go to SA every weekend, and they had like twelve of them...I just wanted to make sure this figure could look upwards, so I could pose him on all fours... |
|
|
|
Post by rupert on Mar 29, 2005 11:48:11 GMT -5
[glow=red,2,300]no problem. here's a shot of mcfarlane spideys neck. (sorry its so blurry)[/glow]  and for fun sake:  |
|
|
|
Post by Randy13 on Mar 29, 2005 17:20:29 GMT -5
|
|
