Xevoz Misprints...

[NPherno]

So, having just today completed Wave 1 (and with bits of Wave 2 on the way now...), I set to organizing my parts/papers...

I use the Ninja/Bug box as my storage container, having broken things down into a bag of stickers, a bag of assembly instructions, a bag of rule papers (2 of each), and then 2 bags of glyphs, and 2 'large' (terrain) bags of misc parts... and all of the extra bags stacked... it all fits very well!!! =-]

I am putting the Glyphs away when I notice something odd... the 'part numbers' for some glyphs overlap... which I figured wouldn't be intentional. So, I throw them all onto a table & place them in order by faction.

It turns out that the Neo Sapiens have a likely misprint, as there are 2 NS-14 glyphs (both weapons for the Ninja), and no NS-13 glyph... and the Bio Mechs have 2 BM-07s, and no BM-04 ... figured I'd say something in the event nobody had noticed just yet... and for 'completeness' sake in terms of any info websites, etc =-] I was gonna take a snap of all the glyphs in order, but my camera's all fubar'd right now

N

[CJK Toy Bay]

Good eyes! I noticed this when I started putting the Power Glyph page together on my site and didn't mention it because I was leaving it for people to see on the page but you caught it before I got a chance to get the page up and running.

Anyway here's what I typed up on the page for it:

Bio-Mecha: BM-04 was missing from the original mix however there are 2 Glyphs numbered BM-07. Considering the fact that the -04 Glyphs of other Species are "Foot" it seemed a safe assumption that BM-07, Foot: Jackhammer Kick was actually meant to be BM-04.

Neo Sapiens: NS-13 is missing but there are 2 Glyphs numbered NS-14. There isn't any positive way of knowing which -14 should have been -13. Having the Sword as -12 it seems reasonable that NS-14, Dagger: Blade Block should have been NS-13.


Hopefully I'll have that Glyph page up soon. Half way through getting the section set up I made a big mistake and changed a bunch of stuff. Didn't relaize it wasn't going to work until I was darn near done. I figured it'd be no problem to change it back but turns out that is as well so either way I'm looking at a fair amount of work that I jsut haven't had the time to sit down and polish off.

[Thread Jack]

to be honest, i never even noticed it... but that's cool that you guys cought it...
but what if it's not a mistake, and it just might be, but if it's not... does anyone have any ideas as to why the numbering might have been done that way... or if there might be more pieces coming to us that will just use the same numbers, and they don't mean all that much. but fill in the gaps later... ?